Category Archives: Electro Sensitivity

Five Predictions as Cities Learn to Address Wireless Health Risks

We humans are today exposed to billions of times more electromagnetic radiation in the sub-infrared frequency ranges than our forebears were 100 years ago. Since the first use of radio waves and alternating current, exposures have increased exponentially. With the emergence of the Internet of Things, smart cities, and intelligent transportation, we face a very steep increase in coming years, particularly with the build-out of small cell networks providing “Wi-Fi everywhere.”

From the Directions Magazine – by Lance McKee – July 27,2017

See the full article at https://www.directionsmag.com/article/1065

Brian Stein: Electromagnetic Sensitivity – Full Lecture

EHS = Electro HyperSensitivity

Brian Stein in the UK is very EHS and has made an excellent presentation on how he got to be EHS and his understanding of why the UK government is allowing the telecommunication companies to continue to subject the population to very high levels of RF Radiation / Microwave Radiation.  The answer is MONEY.  The government cannot afford to jeopardize this cash cow.

The situation in Canada and the US is exactly the same as that in the UK.  MONEY trumps HEALTH and ETHICS.

Please view this presentation.  This is one of the best presentations on EHS I have seen.

Even BC Greens Don’t Care About Microwave Hazards. Sharon Noble – June 5, 2017 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard

(audio 32:59) Even BC Greens Don’t Care About Microwave Hazards. Sharon Noble – June 5, 2017 – The Goddard Report with Jim Goddard by talkdigitalnetwork – YouTube – June 05, 2017:
(Just a month or two of cell phone use could double brain cancer risk
Guest’s website: https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/)
&

= = =

The Goddard Report Video Archives of Interviews with Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters re Smart Meters and Health Issues from Wireless Technologies:

https://www.youtube.com/user/talkdigitalnetwork/search?query=sharon+noble

there is no safe dose of wireless radiation – Dr Neil Cherry

Dr. Neil Cherry  (1946 – 2003)

No matter how difficult the task is to stop EMF harm at the source, in respect and honour to those of us who have already died from EMFs, especially the ones who knew it was from involuntary second hand exposures, and today understanding how irreversible the future loss of lives will be after a thirty year latency period has come to be realized and being horrifically aware how severe the genetic mutations caused by EMF exposures today will be at future births is predicted to be for generations to come, I will continue to educate for all those willing to learn that
there is no safe dose of wireless radiation.

~ Dianne Knight

see more at  http://www.stayonthetruth.com/neil-cherry.php

 

 

5G Radiation Dangers – 11 Reasons To Be Concerned

See this excellent summary of the new 5G Cell Communications technology that is being developed and in some cases implemented.

The 5G has many benefits over the current 3G and 4G cellular systems BUT is has many many potential health impacts that you should be aware of.

See the details by Lloyd Burrell at Electric Sense

http://www.electricsense.com/12399/5g-radiation-dangers/

Summary

#1 – A Denser Soup of Electrosmog
#2 – Effects on the Skin
#3 – Effects on the Eyes
#4 – Effects On The Heart
#5 – Immune System Effects
#6 – Effects on Cell Growth Rates
#7 – Effects on Bacteria Resistance
#8 – Effects on Plant Health
#9 – Effects on the Atmosphere and Depletion of Fossil Fuels
#10 – Disruption of the Natural Ecosystem
#11 – Most 5G Studies Mis-Leading

Waterloo man blames Wi-Fi for sickness

Here is an interesting item from 2012 about EHS.

EHS has been known for years and the number of people who are suffering from level 9-10 EHS is increasing dramatically.

Many people with level 4-6 EHS suffer but have not connected the dots that link their feeling of unease,  head aches,  sore muscles,  trouble sleeping, etc. is caused by the high levels of RFR (radio frequency radiation) from WiFi routers,  DECT phones,  cell towers and in some cases sleeping too close to Smart Meters.

Many people, most people, who have level 1-3 EHS seem not to feel any impact from RFR but they are being hammered by RFR at the same rate as the others and the long term impact will probably be the same.  Lots of research being done on this.

http://www.metronews.ca/news/kitchener/2012/10/29/waterloo-man-blames-wi-fi-for-sickness.html

WHO – Setting the standard for a wireless world of harm – A Call for Action and Accountability by Olga Sheean – January 30, 2017

WHO World Health Organization – Setting the standard for a wireless world of harm – A Call for Action and Accountability by Olga Sheean – January 30, 2017:
http://olgasheean.com/who-harm/  [http://olgasheean.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/WHO-setting-the-standard-for-a-wireless-world-of-harm.pdf]

To: Dr Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization
Date: 30 January 2017
Copied to:
• Emilie van Deventer, PhD, Head of the International EMF Project, WHO
• António Guterres, Secretary-General, United Nations
• Catalina Devandas Aguilar, Special UN Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities

• WHO regional offices, government agencies, MPs, investigative journalists, relevant organizations, advocacy groups and scientists worldwide

 
The World Health Organization is failing the Earth’s citizens in the most blatant, destructive manner. In December 2016, a VOTE of NO CONFIDENCE in WHO and its EMF Project was initiated in response to the growing concerns among the millions of global citizens being harmed by radiofrequency/microwave radiation. The petition has been signed by thousands of individuals worldwide, with more adding their vote every day as they become aware of how WHO’s denial of the proven dangers has stripped them of their health, rights, livelihood, productivity and protection from their own governments. As of today, 30 January 2017, there are 2,003 names on the list (attached), with more being added daily. Details of the voting initiative are shown in appendix 3. Recognizing the significance of this growing discontent with your wilful neglect, and heeding the urgent call to protective action, are important first steps towards addressing an epidemic that threatens all forms of life on our planet. Nothing short of full implementation of the recommendations presented herein will resolve this crisis.
 
Radiofrequency/microwave radiation is everywhere—constantly and increasingly emanating from cell phones, WiFi routers, cell towers and telecommunications satellites. It is proliferating unchecked and people are suffering and dying because of it. Via its International EMF Project, WHO is supposed to be protecting us from the harmful effects of this radiation—radiation that we cannot see, smell or taste, even though it penetrates and affects every cell of our electromagnetic bodies.
 
WHO is failing to protect its global citizens from this pervasive pollutant in four key ways:
 
1. industry infiltration
2. intentional ignorance
3. denial of the science
4. disregard for humanity.
 
This document provides details of these inexcusable failures and what urgently needs to be done to address them. It also outlines what WHO must do to reverse this destructive course—for itself and for the global citizens it is supposed to protect. One of the most crucial and urgent steps to be taken is the replacement of the head of the EMF Project, Emilie van Deventer (an electrical engineer with zero health credentials) with an independent, unbiased, medically qualified professional who has firsthand experience and knowledge of microwave sickness/electro-sensitivity and the many other devastating consequences, such as brain cancer, neurological disorders, DNA damage and infertility.
 
You can no longer claim ignorance or justify any further delay. Only one question remains, and what you do next will clearly demonstrate where you stand on this issue:
 
Are you committed to forever debating the science, siding with industry and postponing action, or are you committed to protecting our health?
 
The world is watching and we are waiting for your response.
 
Sincerely,
Olga Sheean
Former international civil servant, brain-tumour survivor and electro-sensitive individual
 
The full document can also be freely downloaded at http://olgasheean.com/who-harm
 
Make your voice count – Sign this VOTE of NO CONFIDENCE in WHO’s EMF Project:
http://olgasheean.com/who-emf/

Electrosensitivity – an Environmental illness, an Authentic Diagnosis, not a Delusional Disorder

January 2017
 
To my Medical Colleagues, GPs, Psychiatrists, Neurologists and others:
 
Electrosensitivity – an Environmental illness, an Authentic Diagnosis, not a Delusional Disorder by Dr. Andrew Tresidder
 
Summary:
 
Electrosensitivity is the symptomatic sensitivity to Electric or Magnetic Fields of any frequency, including RadioFrequency (RF or Microwave) transmissions. As a symptomatic condition, it is becoming common due to the increasing environmental pressure on human biology. The source is pollution from wireless and other EM fields. Doctors as yet rarely recognize it due to educational issues. Safety always lags technological advance. There are barriers to recognition of harms. Current UK Advisory Safety Limits are based upon the outdated and disproven myth that Non-Thermal means Non-Harmful. Society and organizations have yet to fully travel the road from ‘there isn’t a problem’, ‘there might be a problem but it’s very small’ to ‘there is a problem’. Society does not recognize humans as electromagnetic beings, as well as physical bodies needing careful nutrition to maintain health. Meanwhile, increasing numbers of people suffer, often ignored or dismissed because society doesn’t yet appreciate the issue, and doctors have no answers. Electrosensitivity is soundly supported by both biology and physics.
 
You may be being consulted by a person who has this under-recognised condition. Thank you for reading this. It provides information that you may not easily find elsewhere. Electrosensitivity (ES) is a condition first described in 1932, and is when a person’s physiology is affected by external Electromagnetic (EM) fields, giving rise to a typical spectrum of symptoms, often neurological. It is therefore an illness caused by environmental agents – essentially an environmental toxic pollutant. Electrophobia is a fear of EM fields, and is a nocebo driven response. Symptoms of fear or paranoia about any agent, circumstances, person or issues can be part of a psychiatric condition, and may be part of a delusional state which will have other features. ES is completely separate from any delusional condition and from Electrophobia. ES is a condition that can arise due to continued exposure to an environment polluted by man-made EM and RF (radio-frequency) wireless signals at levels at orders of magnitude below heating effects, and is well understood in Russia. Symptoms include headaches, fatigue, disturbed sleep, tingling, pains in limbs, head or face, stabbing pains, brain-fog and impaired cognitive function, dizziness, tinnitus, nosebleeds, palpitations and others.
 
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, (now known to be partially a failure of mitochondrial function) was initially difficult to diagnose and indeed dismissed by some as psychological illnesses. I have written this briefing sheet to summarise my understanding of ES in case you wish to consider it in your differential diagnosis….
 
 
Dr Andrew Tresidder MBBS MRCGP (1989) Cert Med Ed, Section 12 Approved Doctor
Sea Ilminster Somerset TA19 0SB
Andrew.tresidder@tesco.net

Radiation protection in conflict with science

franz-adlkofer-radiation-protection

The world if overflowing in data and information and it is difficult to keep focused on what is important.  I search and follow many links and sometimes find very valuable items.  This is one.  Please read.

Radiation protection in conflict with science

by Pr Franz Adlkofer  – 2011

See wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/Nextup+Franz+Adlkofer.pdf

EHS RETREATS – In this article there is reference to the Area for the EHS – Forest Saoû France a retreat for those suffering from EHS.   Do a web search and read.  This was a good idea until the governments shut it down.  I must research more on EHS safety sites.

Here is a new link on the French EHS retreats – http://www.next-up.org/France/An_area_for_the_EHS.php  –  I have no ideal if this is still active.