1) Once again I goofed, but this time twice in one update. So sorry.
First, a screenshot didn’t work. Here is a link to the facebook comment.
A facebook comment from a smeter fighter in Quebec regarding BC Hydro threatening to shut off power — and, worse, actually doing so to many, even in this cold weather.
(click on photos to enlarge)
Second, the attached article was difficult to read, so I obtained a link to it but failed to include it in “Letters“.
Today in our Penticton Herald paper, page A7:
Question for candidates: ”Should Canada ban Chinese-controlled Huawei Techn. From the coming 5G network?”
Green Candidate Robert Mellalieu says 5G “pose no more health risk than to the current phone systems”
2) If microcell transmitters are deemed to be too dangerous to have near fire halls, how can they be allowed on poles within feet of children’s bedroom?
Firefighters Fighting Fires and Now Cell Towers
“Susan Foster, IAFF resolution co-author, wrote a chilling and cautionary letter to the City of Palo Alto in 2018 regarding the firefighters experience once cell towers were in place. She noted, “The firefighters’ most important lesson to us may be that if we allow a buildout of small cell aimed at facilitating 5G such that they are as commonplace in front of homes and schools as they are now on fire stations, we may be facing not only an immediate risk of impairment to some degree, but later a tsunami of Alzheimer’s and dementia. The rate of people dying from Alzheimer’s disease in the United States rose by 55% over a 15-year period according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control.”
This article includes a lot of information about what cities and communities have done. There is a model ordinance by Los Altos City Council which could help in addressing the issue before our Councils.
Ordinance Wireless Facilities
3) Advice from the industry about how cities should prepare for 5G, including “educating” people on the lack of concern re. radiation. Misinform, mislead… Good advice about the need for municipal policies to limit the installations as much as possible. Yet to be determined if the municipality has the right to determine if its property (the rights of way) can be used or can telecoms take over the land without consultation, notification with or agreement by the Council and the public.
Cities are facing ‘an absolute land grab’ from telecoms in wake of 5G
Despite the slow roll out of 5G, cities should prepare for telecoms garnering control of deployment and infrastructure, experts at Smart Cities Connect said.
“City residents have raised concerns over the health impacts of 5G infrastructure, especially radiation effects from the towers and other cells used to transmit the signal. While Gupta said that the radiation risk is low, cities could play a role in educating their residents about 5G and why health fears are unfounded.”
4) Project Censored identifies 5G/EMR as #12 out of the top 25 under-reported, hidden, suppressed topics. Media has not covered the 2 most important studies done, the NTP and the Ramazzini Studies. They refuse to publish our letters and press releases. They refuse to advise the public about the recent report that 90% of cell phones inspected emit higher RF than allowed by the already dangerous guidelines. The public is being told false/incorrect information about there being no evidence of harm, spreading the industry mantra that there needs to be proof of harm before any restrictions on wireless devices can be required. And Health Canada is a willing collaborator with industry. Profit at any price…even our health.
- New 5G Network Spurs Health Concerns
“There is little or no substantive corporate media coverage of 5G health concerns….
Instead, corporate news reports have focused on the proposed benefits of 5G—including, for example, faster data speeds, 3D imaging, and investment opportunities—while emphasizing lack of consensus among experts regarding any attendant health risks. This tendency can be seen in a November 2018 CNN article, “Federal Health Agencies Disagree over Link between Cell Phone Radiation and Cancer,” which reported on “confusion and controversy” regarding science in a split between the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration.”
5) Devonshire, UK. Residents concerned about the health effects of 5G pressured the Council for a moratorium, and got it. The list of towns and communities around the world banning 5G is growing. Let’s see if we can get some BC names on that list.
Town’s war with 5G: Devonshire officials ‘ban’ installation of new high-speed network after campaigners demand further research into its effects on health
“The push to roll out the latest 5G mobile technology across the country has hit a snag – from angry residents in a quiet corner of Devon.
The next generation of mobile internet connectivity is supposed to transform our lives by enabling the fastest speeds and most reliable connections on smartphones and other devices.
But campaigners in Totnes claim it is a serious health hazard and have persuaded local officials to declare a moratorium on installing the high-frequency network.
Although the decision has no force in planning law, campaign leader John Kitson claims the action by Totnes town council is a warning to ministers that they cannot bring in 5G without further research into its effects on health.”
6) Below in Letters is a template that a group in the UK, “Save Us Now”, is encouraging the public to send widely to inform those involved in 5G or hiding it as part of a legal effort. I have no idea if his statements/assertions are correct but they are similar to the charges Ray Broomhall, an Australian lawyer, is making. It would be very helpful to get a lawyer’s opinion about this approach.
THE ROLLOUT OF 5G TECHNOLOGY IS AN INDICTABLE CRIME
5G IS UNINSURABLE AND DANGEROUS AND WILL KILL ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE.
IT WAS DEVELOPED FOR BATTLEFIELD PURPOSES AND
HAS NO SAFE ROLE IN OUR TOWNS, CITIES OR COUNTRIES.
THE FOLLOWING SHORT LETTER SHOULD BE SENT
BY EMAIL AND REGISTERED POST TO
COMPANY DIRECTORS – SHAREHOLDERS – EMPLOYEES – COUNCILS – COUNCILLORS – POLITICIANS – MEDIA AND OTHERS WHO ARE IGNORING THE LAW.
Call first to ensure that the right person receives the document and note down the name(s).
Mark Steele encourages people who read this and share it to support the SAVE-US-NOW Movement so that we can focus our FULL resources and attention behind our legal team to bring the criminal cabals behind this unlawful and illegal activity to justice.
It is time to go on the offensive.
I am bringing to your attention the scientifically established fact that the rollout of 5G technology and the experimental LED carrier assets are indictable offences under domestic and international laws, and a crime against humanity and the environment. PHE have already warned of the health risk. Your involvement in the deployment, deception, misinformation and cover-up in the wider community and continued support for this crime have been noted. Any further support of this indictable offence provided by you once you have been informed by this letter will demonstrate your real intent in regard to this crime.
To mitigate your involvement, we demand that you cease and desist from your role in the rollout of 5G, so that the main architects of this criminal enterprise can be held accountable, while those who have been coerced into involvement can be seen to have acted in less serious roles. The Accessories and Abettors act 1861 as amended by the Criminal Law Act 1977 covers all those who can be shown to have known of this human rights crime yet who have not acted in accordance with the law.
[Add your name]
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology in which nobody understands *anything* about science and technology.
And this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces.” ~ Carl Sagan, 1996