1) From Mona Nilsson: “A large number of research studies show that the fetus can be damaged by exposure to radiation from wireless technology, which can cause lasting damage and lead to illness for the child.
Expectant mothers should be informed about the risks of this.”
Electromagnetic fields exposure on fetal and childhood abnormalities: Systematic review and meta-analysis
“Maternal exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially in the first trimester of pregnancy, due to the high level of stem cells and their high sensitivity to this radiation, the biochemical parameters of the umbilical cord blood examined was shown increased oxidative stress reactions, changes in protein gene expression, DNA damage, and increased embryonic abnormalities. In addition, parental exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation can lead to the enhancement of different cell-based cancers and developmental disorders such as speech problems in childhood.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10183723/
2) Wireless charging to every wireless device with continuous emissions that reach throughout the home. OMG!! The report in the first item should be sent to this company.
(click on photos to enlarge)
RF Power Transmitter Ushers Over-the-Air Wireless Charging into Homes
“Powercast will be at CES 2023 with its Ubiquity RF power transmitter, a device it hopes can make a pervasive presence of RF wireless power in smart homes. With this transmitter, Powercast claims to have lowered the barrier to entry into having multiple RF wireless power transmitters covering every home….
The Ubiquity transmitter can output up to 1 W (3 W EIRP) and automatically charges multiple RF-enabled devices that come into its charging zone, with no charging mats needed. Power-hungry devices charge faster within several feet of the transmitter, while ultra-low-power devices like IoT sensors can charge up to 120 feet.”
3) In response to my request for information from anyone participating in the Isla webinar re. the low EMF community in Nicaragua, a member sent this:
“I’ve been attending the Isla presentations. Here are some pros and cons:
I am impressed with the quality of the buildings, the developers spoke about, as well as Nicaragua’s opposition to Starlink’s radiation, to the WHO and to chemtrails.
With China’s recent development of satellites that will beam radiation over the planet, eliminating the “need” for cell towers, I have concerns. The area for this development is adjacent to a teak forest, otherwise, there is no protection from these satellites, to the best of my knowledge.
The community design seems very nice. Community will be important in Isla.
The beach sounds like a great place to discharge emf/emr, and to inspire joy.
Nicaragua does not have “close” relationship with the US, so warnings from the US should be looked at carefully.
Medical care is not easily accessible. Residents have health care coverage until 60 years of age. The hospital is about 1.25 hours from Isla.
I’ve heard different stories about the safety in Nicaragua. Some say its the safest country in Central America. An acquaintance, who just returned from Nicaragua, said the streets are lined with police and military.
The developers estimate that the homes will be ready for move in, 18 months to 2 years.
The properties have HOA”s. Pros and cons.
The community could be quite isolated, but this could be better than living in the bush/in vehicles/etc. as some suffers of EHS are doing. Yet, a community of others with EHS might be quite nice.
That’s all from the top of my head.”
Sharon Noble, Director, Citizens for Safer Tech
“Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen.” Albert Einstein
Sent from my wired laptop with no wireless components. PLEASE Practice Safe Tech.