1) With solid scientific evidence that RFR has the potential to cause significant harm, especially to the unborn and children, and technology that could be employed to make wireless devices safer, why hasn’t the Precautionary Principle been employed? Why, after seeing the effects of ignoring evidence that asbestos and tobacco were dangerous, are we having to go the same, convoluted route with RFR? This is a very important report.
(click on photos to enlarge)
Applying the Precautionary Principle to Wireless Technology: Policy Dilemmas and Systemic Risks
“In this article, we briefly review the early history of policy development on RFR, provide evidence of significant adverse nonthermal chronic impacts from exposures that are not considered in current standards, and make the case for implementing the precautionary principle to protect public health and the environment. As with most environmental health hazards, the consequences of RFR are especially important to the fetus and children, as they will incur a lifetime of exposures that is without precedent. We thus argue for the adoption of the precautionary principle to reduce chronic, societal-level risks from exposures….
This article has demonstrated that there is substantial evidence that an unhealthy relationship exists between the highly profitable telecommunications and information technology industries and their regulatory body, the FCC92,93 in the United States. Further, there is evidence that ICNIRP and the IEEE constitute essentially military–industrial standards bodies that have not kept pace with relevant scientific findings regarding chronic health and environmental impacts.
At this juncture, various accessible and economical technological solutions are available to mitigate the impact of contemporary exposures to RFR with minimal or no increase in costs.94 Héroux et al., for example, recently detailed several practical ways to achieve lower radiation from phones without compromising functionality or quality.“
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epub/10.1080/00139157.2024.2293631
2) Another phone found to be non-compliant as reported by Phonegate. I am still attempting to get more information from ISED about cell phones tested in Canada over the last 5 years. It is tough — ISED will not release test data without receiving agreement from “third parties”, aka the manufacturers. Fox-henhouse scenario. I have not been able to find where Logicom phones are sold in Canada, so they may be available only in EU.
⚡️📱The Logicom Flow has just been pinned for non-compliance with regulations.
👉This is the 47th health-endangering model to be updated or withdrawn from the French market.
👉However, our calculator shows that the actual trunk and body SARs of this device are 5.250 W/kg and 6.9 W/kg, well above the risk levels for users.
👉More seriously, Logicom is a repeat offender. The French manufacturer alone accounts for over 10% of the dangerous phones tested, with the M BOT 60, HOLA, SWIPPE, PULSE and FLOW.
👉 So many reasons to advise against buying LOGICOM smartphones!
Dr. Arazi now has a blog, in English.
Letters:
From: “VISTA” <VISafeTechAlliance@proton.me>
Sent: February 21, 2024
Subject: FYI: Dove Creek tower POSTPONED until March 11, 10 am
The meeting to discuss the Dove Creek tower has been pushed forward to the Mar 11 CVRD EASC meeting, so it won’t happen on Mon, Feb 26.
We will email the Friday before the meeting to confirm. Please put Mar 11, 10 am in your calendar.
Thanks!
Vancouver Island Safe Tech Alliance (VISTA)
__________________________________________________________________________
From: “Andrea Schwenke Wyile NSMNS” (name given with permission)
To: “Sharon Noble” <citizensforsafertech@shaw.ca>
Subject: copper land lines
I recently gave up my Bell landline because it was costing way more (like $100 a month more) than most other people’s services and because, as your letter writer states, the functionality was increasingly crappy and erratic. Already two years ago a technician said that all the crackling was probably worse when it was wet out. Last summer, phone calls would go to what I call “call park” some nothing zone, and then I’d have no phone line for a time. The calls might be cut off after the first ring, so then there was no way of leaving messages.
So I switched to a new internet provider, Purple Cow Internet, that is trying to drive prices down. The price is 1/4 to 1/3 of what I had to pay Bell. The catch is that it’s a VoIP phone and Canada-wide coverage doesn’t seem to include the Territories, and I can’t call Europe. Quite a serious adjustment required. And the worst of it is that the Hitron modem [- https://us.hitrontech.com/service-providers/docsis-modems-gateways/] still emits lots of radiation with the WiFi OFF.
All that led to this synopsis (which doesn’t quite tell the whole story):
https://www.widowwyile.com/blog/landlinefarewell
__________________________________________________________________________
From: Georgia Taylor Proctor and Gillean Proctor (names given with permission)
Residents of Salt Spring Island.
Re: Copper lines
We could not function here without a land line because the cell service in and around Ganges and further afield is so sporadic. In fact, since Rogers’ tower went up in Channel Ridge, it is next to impossible to use our cell phones from home. However, Thetis Island is receiving great benefit from the tragic invasion of Rogers in the
Canvas Back Road Channel Ridge Invasion on Salt Spring.
Sharon Noble, Director, Citizens for Safer Tech
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” Benjamin Franklin
Sent from my wired laptop with no wireless components. PLEASE Practice Safe Tech.