1) A press release regarding the 18 teachers who raised concerns about cell towers and left their school due to these concerns.
(click on photos to enlarge)
Health groups applaud North York high school staff refusing work alongside a powerful cell tower
“Prevent Cancer Now joins Canadian Educators for Safe Technology, Canadians for Safe Technology and Environmental Pollution Illness Canada, applauding job action at William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute in Toronto suburb, North York. Educators are exercising a refusal to work, due to health concerns over emissions from numerous network antennas on a nearby cell tower….
“Human and environmental health are suffering as a result of RFR used for telecommunications. Instead, we can use safer, more resilient, faster, higher bandwidth wireline connectivity, such as fibre optics, to provide data and communication services for schools, communities and businesses. Best practices call for intentional prevention and reduction of radiation exposures. We’re not waiting for the technology—we’re waiting for the vision, imagination and leadership.””
https://mailchi.mp/preventcancernow/hwopk700n7-17571692
And it was published by the Toronto Sun.
2) More confirmation that cellphone use affects the quality of sperm which could be a contributing factor to the low fertility rate that is being experienced in many countries.
Mobile phone use may affect semen quality
“A team from UNIGE and Swiss TPH has published a large study covering more than a decade of data on the effects of mobile phones on semen quality of young men…
These data revealed an association between frequent use and lower sperm concentration. The median sperm concentration was significantly higher in the group of men who did not use their phone more than once a week (56.5 million/mL) compared with men who used their phone more than 20 times a day (44.5 million/mL). This difference corresponds to a 21% decrease in sperm concentration for frequent users (>20 times/day) compared to rare users (<1 time>”
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1006437
3) Industry insiders said that smeters’ lifespan is between 5-7 years, compared to the 20-30+ years for our old reliable analog meters. These are basically small computers with software that must be upgraded. In the UK, concern is raised about smeters needing to be replaced due to phasing out of 2G and 3G. Could this happen here once 3G and 4G are phased out? Would the entire grid have to be “upgraded”? We warned BC Hydro and BCUC that smeters are an endless cost and questioned if this had been considered in business plans — to no avail.
In 2016, BC Hydro had to replace 88,000 of smeters shortly after they were installed:
https://theprovince.com/news/b-c-hydro-must-remove-more-than-88000-smart-meters
No information has been provided about the number replaced annually or the associated costs — it’s just a bottomless pit being filled with our money.
Smart Meters: The Future of Energy or a Technological Misstep?
“Smart meters were touted as the solution to energy bean counting, and while there have certainly been some success stories, a new report has discovered that as many as 7 million smart meters will fail when older cellular networks are shut down. What exactly will this situation lead to, why does this demonstrate the dangers of poor engineering when relying on short-lived technologies, and how can engineers rectify such mistakes going forward?…
One such example of where rapid changes in technology resulted in major issues with obsolesce was (and still is) the PC market. A machine bought in one year can quickly find itself outmoded in a matter of years, and while some hardware upgrades can be made to keep the machine practically usable, in other cases, even hardware upgrades cannot solve the issue (as was the case with the introducing of Windows 11 requiring secure boot platforms which many machines lack).”
https://www.electropages.com/blog/2023/10/smart-meters-future-energy-or-technological-misstep
4) A dog has helped a family being exposed to high levels of EMF. In this post, the person used an “app” to measure what he calls “frequencies”. I think he meant the level of radiation emissions. I have asked what the “app” was that could do this but, so far, have not received a response. If I do, I will share.
[https://reviewed.usatoday.com/smarthome/features/smart-plugs-vs-smart-outlets]
Sharon Noble, Director, Citizens for Safer Tech
“We’re in a giant car heading towards a brick wall and everyone’s arguing over where they’re going to sit.” David Suzuki
Sent from my wired laptop with no wireless components. Practice Safe Tech.