1) An analysis by Dr. Louis Slesin of the background of this lawsuit which includes a decision by a judge who used to work for a telecom.
(click on photos to enlarge)
All Plaintiff Experts Barred in Cell Phone Brain Tumor Lawsuits
Twenty-Two Years and Counting
“In a big win for the telecoms, and Motorola in particular, a judge has disallowed testimony from the entire slate of expert witnesses who were scheduled to support claims that cell phones can lead to brain tumors….
If past is prologue, there’s much more to come —if only because the stakes are so high. In 2015, the Wall Street Journal estimated that the 13 Murray lawsuits were seeking a combined total of close to $2 billion.
“We will be appealing,” Jeffrey Morganroth told Microwave News from his office near Detroit. “We’re disappointed, but we believe the Court got it wrong as a matter of fact and law in numerous respects.”
“Our experts are world-renowned and preeminent scientists who have dedicated their lives to studying and researching this critical public health issue,” he said.
“This is not the end of cell phone litigation,” Morganroth emphasized. “We are committed to making sure our clients get their day in court.””
https://microwavenews.com/news-center/judge-bars-expert-witnesses
2) The personal story of life after giving up a cellphone and reducing, dramatically, exposure to EMF. The industry is making living without a cellphone difficult — landline phones are hard to find in hotels, airports, etc. People find life so much easier with a phone, being able to search the internet at any time, using it to find a location. But the price paid for this convenience with high, deadly high for many. Please share this article with friends and family who love their phones.
RESTORED HEALTH AND VITALITY FROM DITCHING MY CELL PHONE
“My energy level changed noticeably after giving up my phone. I went from long days surrounded by wireless technology which rendered me exhausted, to equally long workdays ending still healthy feeling and still energetic. Now I easily move from the end of the workday to getting on my bicycle or hiking boots and going, rather than languishing due to low energy. This is the primary reason I will not go back to wireless phone or wireless computer. My life, my living is that much better now. I haven’t needed acupuncture for several months. My prana is better. My chi is stronger.”
https://cellphonetaskforce.org/restore-health-and-vitality-from-ditching-my-cell-phone-k-burke/
3) Another excellent article re. FCC written by Peter Elkind, the author of the great one in the May 2 update, “The FCC Is Supposed to Protect the Environment. It Doesn’t.” This one was written about 6 mos. ago and also concludes that the FCC is supporting industry rather than doing the job that most Americans believe it has — protecting people. Again, just about everything written here could be written about Health Canada.
How the FCC Shields Wireless Providers from Safety Concerns
“The FCC is an improbable organization to serve the role of protecting humans. It specializes in technical issues that make the communications system function, not in health and safety. “At the FCC, they feel like this is really not their problem,” said Edwin Mantiply, who dealt with cellphone-radiation issues before retiring from the agency four years ago. “It’s not their job to do this kind of thing. They might have a token biologist or two, but that’s not their job.” The result, Mantiply said, was that in situations where the science isn’t black and white — and it isn’t when it comes to cellphones — the agency tended to listen to the telecom industry, which vehemently insists that cellphones are safe. “They don’t really want to deal with uncertainty,” Mantiply said of the FCC.”
https://www.propublica.org/article/fcc-5g-wireless-safety-cellphones-risk
Sharon Noble, Director, Citizens for Safer Tech
“Many of life’s failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.” Thomas A. Edison
Sent from my wired laptop with no wireless components. Practice Safe Tech.